Wednesday, September 02, 2009

Carrie Prejean Suing For Religious Discrimination...I've Got A Better Idea

Carrie Prejean…

Dethroned former Miss California, former Miss U.S.A. Runner-Up, and now..?

One holy-rollin’, hot, litigious bitch…

She’s suing the Miss California Pageant organization (run by K2 Productions) for among other things, Religious Discrimination.

Now as Prejean is a chick who told a Republican group that losing her crown was in God’s plan, I can only assume that God has also advised her to sue Shanna Moakler, K2 Productions, et al. for their thievery of her crown…

Much like God obviously advised her to allow the Miss California Pageant officials to pay for her uber-successful breast implants prior to the Miss U.S.A. pageant.

Not only does God move in mysterious ways, he obviously digs Evangelical babes with perfectly formed fun bags.

Prejean is alleging that because of her anti-gay marriage stance and religious views, the title of Miss California was stripped from her. Those Godless bastards.

This hubbub all began back in April when Prejean stated during the Miss U.S.A. Pageant interview round that she believes in “opposite marriage” as opposed to same-sex marriage.

Her answer became a flashpoint of controversy after one of the pageant judges, the gay, talent-less fucktard, Perez Hilton went on a national rant.

Prejean says that her anti-gay marriage answer not only cost her the Miss U.S.A. crown but later, her title of Miss California as well.

Personally, I wouldn’t have lowered her score because of her marriage position, that’s her belief and so be it. I would have lowered her score for using the term, “opposite marriage”.

I would have thought to myself:

“Holy Cow, it’s such a shame that such a hot, full body is being kept alive and directed around by such an empty, empty head…No title for you, for putting a crown on that noggin would surely collapse its unsupported skull.”

Here’s the thing though…When one is being judged, don’t the judges bring their own prejudices, opinions, and ideas of what they want to see in a contestant to the judges’ table? Sure they do…

If I was a judge for one of these things, I would have an inclination to give a higher score to a chick who had dark hair, big tits, and could put complete sentences together.

If the judges didn’t like her answer and lowered her score because of it, that’s the way the tiara tumbles…and crying over it and suing over it, exposes Prejean to be more than what her nude photos showed her to be.

Carrie Prejean is an opportunist seeking celebrity, fame, and a huge payoff. The thing that turns her from a woman of physical beauty into a hideous human being is her hypocrisy.

She claims that her faith in God and the Holy Baby Jeebus has been her undoing. Nice try, Miss Hypocrite. You are not a follower of Biblical teachings, you are merely trying to use them as a catalyst for your advancement.

I don’t think God would appreciate your breast implants. They altered His image of you. He wouldn’t appreciate your nude photos. They were an affront to Him.

He wouldn’t appreciate His work being judged by idiotic dickheads like Perez Hilton in front of a national audience. That just flat pisses Him off.

You can’t have it both ways Miss Hypocrite, and you can’t get your crown back, but I do have a better idea on how to settle this issue while helping you to make amends with God Almighty…

Shut the fuck and up, and while you’re at it, give your breast implants back to the Miss California Pageant officials.

God would dig that.

Cheers!!

21 comments:

Scott Oglesby said...

You know, I’m actually torn on this one. First of all.. I sincerely believe that everyone has the right to their opinions and free speech. No matter how ignorant. BUT, if you are putting yourself on stage (literally and figuratively) for people to judge you?? I guess you deserve what you get. Even if it means giving the Donald a blowjob without the promised reward.

Schmoop said...

Scott: While I'm not torn, I agree with you. She have can have a different opinion but she has to realize that in a contest such as this, it may sway the vote of some judges in a negative way.

As for me, while her opinion differs from mine, had she put her answer in a thoughtful and coherent way it would garner my respect, and had I been a judge it would have scored points on my card. Cheers Scott!!

Dana said...

Although I think legal actions in this situation are just plain silly, I'm with you - it was the realization that she was one or two brain cells wrapped up in pretty packaging that made her a "looser" in my book. Too bad she didn't get the Miss California pageant folks to pay for a brain enlargement!

Schmoop said...

Dana: They probably considered a brain enlargement but nixed the idea in fear of it leaving a noticeable and hideous scar therby having her new found intellect negating her pre-existing beauty, leaving her a second rate contestant. Cheers!!

David said...

Beauty contests are very cut-throat while also being rather silly affairs. The viewers watch for entertainment, the promoters run them for profit, the judges appear for publicity and the contestants…ego and a media-catching title for visibility, I suppose.

If she had a brain, she would have known that the only possible reason they would have invited the tedious Perez Hilton to be a judge was because he practically guarantees a large volume of scandalous media attention. And her headlights led her right into the trap. Criticizing gay-marriage in the midst of the whole Prop 8 whirlwind, I doubt that any Californians would notice.

But being an attention whore, she is satisfying that addiction with this frivolous (IMO) lawsuit.

Cheers

Ken said...

Maybe she could go to Hong Kong too.

Schmoop said...

David: You're damn right with your critique of the entire dynamics taking place on all fronts and interests.

And Prejean is merely using this as a vehicle to increase her publicity and get signed up for some more speaking gigs. Which I find ironic since she doesn't speak very well. Cheers David!!

Micky: Ha. I have been trying to put a post together about that. Exactly what does Gov. "Lame and Tall" have to offer a economic and financial conference in Hong Kong? Oh Dear God. Cheers Mick!!

Jay said...

Even though I disagree with her, I think the question about gay marriage was unfair. Nobody else got asked anything harder than who their favorite designer or favorite pop star was. To ask a highly charged political question of ONE contestant wasn't fair at all.

But now? Poor Carrie apparently can't get back on Fox News or The View and realizes that nobody is paying any attention to her. Or paying her. So, she is just looking for not only more publicity, but filing a frivolous lawsuit that she knows she will lose. But, she wants to lose. It helps her with her victim status among the professional victim crowd on the Christian Right. They always feel that they're being persecuted, ya know.

Schmoop said...

Jay: Not a bad point however like I said, she could have handled it better. I think you're giving her some low level support because you find her hot...and I respect that, because I too would really like to engage in opposite sex with her.

And you're dead on on the second part of your comment. Especially the part about the Christian Right and Christans in general feeling as though they have been and are being persecuted. Why wouldn't they feel that way?

After all, look at our 44 Presidents and the number of non-Christians who have been elected to that office. Cheers Jay!!

katherine. said...

Yeah...this is a fairly ridiculous lawsuit. But it certainly gets her more attention.

Not so sure any of the other contestants were any smarter.

Schmoop said...

Kat: And that is what she is all about...I didn't watch it, so I don't know if the others were smarter. I have just seen the clips displaying her lack of gray matter in the area of language skills. Cheers Kat!!

Vinny "Bond" Marini said...

Perez Hilton is a bigger a** that Paris Hilton...

Carrie is a freakin lunatic and of course she is "an opportunist seeking celebrity, fame, and a huge payoff. " - that is why she was in the beauty pageants to begin with.

I like Jay's thought about filing the lawsuit, just so she can lose and get back on FOX and the like to decry her being treated so poorly for being such a good Christian...

Schmoop said...

Bond: You are correct. Perez Hilton is a walking freak show and a horrid human being...Paris is merely not all that bright.

And yes, FOX will pimp her victimized "Christianity" to no end. Good Luck to you and Nancy on your opposite marriage. Cheers!!

Ken said...

You know Matt, that last sentence on your comment to Vinny has me thinking there may have been a tint of jealousy in it.
Are you going to be OK, with this opposite marriage? hehehe

Schmoop said...

Micky: You picked up on that? I really want to marry Glenn Beck. He never returns my emails. Cheer Mick!!

Vinny "Bond" Marini said...

You have to be blind and ig-rant to not catch that last sentence...

I am going to champion OPPOSITE marriage!

bwahahahahahahahahaha

I think it is perfect..Opposite marriage means a man can marry a pig or a woman can marry that mule that has been staring at her each day as she drives past the farm

OPPOSITES ATTRACT - ask Paula Abdul

Schmoop said...

Bond: What the Hell are you talking about? Cheers!!

Schmoop said...

Starr: Ha. Yeah I chuckled at the fact that The Donald was left off of the suit. Cheers Starr!!

Michele said...

Carrie must have smart lawyers because she has proven that she is unencumbered by the thought process.

Schmoop said...

Michele: Ha..Indeed she has. Life is easier that way. Cheers Michele!!

Anonymous said...

Hey.
I the opening once upon a time here.It is assured you eventually did not visualize,shame story

chiquita lopez and mandingo
[/url] it was fitting to you?